A Difference Without A Distinction
|
Posted: 08/17/09
|
|
A Difference Without A Distinction
By Thomas E. Brewton
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel has simply changed the way he proposes to ration
healthcare. Dr. Emanuel, the brother of White HOuse Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, is Special Advisor for Health Policy to Peter Orszag, the Director of
the Office of Management and Budget.
Sara Palin and others annoyed proponents of a National Socialist
Healthcare scheme by noting the Dr. Emanuel has opined that rationing
medical care is a necessity. In an effort to douse what has become a
raging forest fire of disapproval, White House spinmeisters have
concocted the following statement from Dr. Emanuel, quoted in the
Washington Times:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/14/white-house-adviser-
backs-off-rationing/?source=newsletter_must-read-stories-today_headlines
"When I began working in the health policy area about 20 years
ago ... I thought we would definitely have to ration care, that there
was a need to make a decision and deny people care," said Dr. Emanuel...
"I think that over the last five to seven years ... I've come to the
conclusion that in our system we are spending way more money than we
need to, a lot of it on unnecessary care," he said. "If we got rid of
that care we would have absolutely no reason to even consider
rationing except in a few cases."
What is the distinction between rationing medical care and
eliminating care that the Federal government's health panels regard
as unnecessary? In how few cases, on what criteria, would Big
Brother nonetheless ration care?
The only truly and consistently unnecessary medical care, and the
costs are huge, is doctors having to order every imaginable test and
procedure to forestall malpractice litigation by the tort bar. If
Dr. Emanuel, the President, and other officials of the Democrat/
Socialist Party really wanted to reduce medical costs, they would
legislate a stop to the tort bar's extortions. They will not do so,
of course, because the tort bar is one of the Democrat/Socialist
Party's chief sources of campaign funding.
Another extract from the Washington Times article, which also quotes
Dr. Emanuel's earlier essays advocating rationing of medical care:
The charges of rationing, or concerns about his language in journal
articles, Dr. Emanuel said, is somewhat understandable given that he
was "writing really for political philosophers, and for the average
person it's not what they're used to reading, even if they've had a
good liberal education."
[Note, by the way, that both Adolph Hitler and Benito Mussolini
qualify as political philosophers under Dr. Emanuel's definition]
Nonetheless, a spokesman for Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican and
a practicing physician, said the senator remains "concerned about the
rationing provisions in the House and Senate bills."
Coburn spokesman John Hart said: "On three different occasions during
the [Senate Health, Education and Labor and Pensions] committee
markup, Dr. Coburn and other Republicans attempted to insert language
prohibiting rationing.
"All three amendments were voted down, which suggests that Democrats
do, in fact, want to preserve the ability to ration care," Mr. Hart
said.
Click Here to Read and Post Feedback
Send this page to a friend
Distributed by www.ChristianWorldviewNetwork.com
Disclaimer: Worldview Weekend, Christian Worldview Network and its columnists do not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the feedback button.
160 Views
Printer Friendly Version |
Return to home
|
|
|
